[IMPORTANT] Working dev branch! #135
Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
I remember asking about this yesterday. I think 100 & 129 were merged into main before it was tested but hadizah and alex probably remember better than me. Is the dev branch only meant to prevent this from happening in main or is there other reasons? Do bugs show up in main frequently or is that only when there was an untested branch that got merged? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This also seems like a good way to use main as precedence when messing with the dev branch so we already know what works |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The final thing that we landed on for this was a great way to get the code started but it got cumbersome after a while. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@Patribots4738/students,
Through some discussion, we have decided to base everything currently in development on a new branch called
sim-dev.
The basis behind this change is to avoid what happened with #129 and #100 merging into the main before completion. Overall your workflow will not change except for the final final step, which is more important for the reviewer than the assignee in most cases:IMPORTANT
Make a PR to
sim-dev
(notmain
). Then, once you are positive that everything is working in sim, you can make another PR fromsim-dev
tomain
. After that is approved, please remember to restore the branch after the merge. If it auto removes the branch, just click therestore
button at the bottom of the PR.Your workflow should be as such:
sim-dev
sim-dev
tomain
, however, do not removesim-dev
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions