From 132104ce4f9493d742921db6ab3edf31a0f94554 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Clifford <benc@hawaga.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:25:47 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] test bad registration message - i think this will SIGABRT
 based on other stuff I've seen?

---
 .../test_interchange_exit_bad_registration.py | 120 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 parsl/tests/test_htex/test_interchange_exit_bad_registration.py

diff --git a/parsl/tests/test_htex/test_interchange_exit_bad_registration.py b/parsl/tests/test_htex/test_interchange_exit_bad_registration.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2a3176f00b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/parsl/tests/test_htex/test_interchange_exit_bad_registration.py
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+import json
+import logging
+import os
+import pickle
+import platform
+import subprocess
+import time
+
+import psutil
+import pytest
+import zmq
+
+import parsl.executors.high_throughput.zmq_pipes as zmq_pipes
+from parsl.executors.high_throughput.executor import DEFAULT_INTERCHANGE_LAUNCH_CMD
+from parsl.executors.high_throughput.manager_selector import RandomManagerSelector
+from parsl.version import VERSION as PARSL_VERSION
+
+P_ms = 10
+
+
+@pytest.mark.local
+def test_exit_with_bad_registrationr(tmpd_cwd, try_assert):
+    """Test that the interchange exits when it receives a bad registration message.
+    This complements parsl/tests/test_scaling/test_worker_interchange_bad_messages_3262.py
+    which tests that the interchange is resistent to other forms of bad message.
+    """
+
+    outgoing_q = zmq_pipes.TasksOutgoing(
+        "127.0.0.1", (49152, 65535), None
+    )
+    incoming_q = zmq_pipes.ResultsIncoming(
+        "127.0.0.1", (49152, 65535), None
+    )
+    command_client = zmq_pipes.CommandClient(
+        "127.0.0.1", (49152, 65535), None
+    )
+
+    interchange_config = {"client_address": "127.0.0.1",
+                          "client_ports": (outgoing_q.port,
+                                           incoming_q.port,
+                                           command_client.port),
+                          "interchange_address": "127.0.0.1",
+                          "worker_ports": None,
+                          "worker_port_range": (50000, 60000),
+                          "hub_address": None,
+                          "hub_zmq_port": None,
+                          "logdir": tmpd_cwd,
+                          "heartbeat_threshold": 120,
+                          "poll_period": P_ms,
+                          "logging_level": logging.DEBUG,
+                          "cert_dir": None,
+                          "manager_selector": RandomManagerSelector(),
+                          "run_id": "test"
+                          }
+
+    config_pickle = pickle.dumps(interchange_config)
+
+    interchange_proc = subprocess.Popen(DEFAULT_INTERCHANGE_LAUNCH_CMD, stdin=subprocess.PIPE)
+    stdin = interchange_proc.stdin
+    assert stdin is not None, "Popen should have created an IO object (vs default None) because of PIPE mode"
+
+    stdin.write(config_pickle)
+    stdin.flush()
+    stdin.close()
+
+    # wait for interchange to be alive, by waiting for the command thread to become
+    # responsive. if the interchange process didn't start enough to get the command
+    # thread running, this will time out.
+
+    (task_port, result_port) = command_client.run("WORKER_PORTS", timeout_s=120)
+
+    # now we'll assume that if the interchange command thread is responding,
+    # then the worker polling code is also running and that the interchange has
+    # started successfully.
+
+    # send bad registration message as if from a new worker pool. The badness here
+    # is that the Python version does not match the real Python version - which
+    # unlike some other bad interchange messages, should cause the interchange
+    # to shut down.
+
+    msg = {'type': 'registration',
+           'parsl_v': PARSL_VERSION,
+           'python_v': "{}.{}.{}".format(1, 1, 1),  # this is the bad bit
+           'worker_count': 1,
+           'uid': 'testuid',
+           'block_id': 0,
+           'start_time': time.time(),
+           'prefetch_capacity': 0,
+           'max_capacity': 1,
+           'os': platform.system(),
+           'hostname': platform.node(),
+           'dir': os.getcwd(),
+           'cpu_count': psutil.cpu_count(logical=False),
+           'total_memory': psutil.virtual_memory().total,
+           }
+
+    # connect to worker port and send this message.
+
+    context = zmq.Context()
+    channel_timeout = 10000  # in milliseconds
+    task_channel = context.socket(zmq.DEALER)
+    task_channel.setsockopt(zmq.LINGER, 0)
+    task_channel.setsockopt(zmq.IDENTITY, b'testid')
+
+    task_channel.set_hwm(0)
+    task_channel.setsockopt(zmq.SNDTIMEO, channel_timeout)
+    task_channel.connect(f"tcp://127.0.0.1:{task_port}")
+
+    b_msg = json.dumps(msg).encode('utf-8')
+
+    task_channel.send(b_msg)
+
+    # check that the interchange exits within some reasonable time
+    try_assert(lambda: interchange_proc.poll() is not None, "Interchange did not exit after killing watched client process", timeout_ms=5000)
+
+    # See issue #3697 - ideally the interchange would exit cleanly, but it does not.
+    # assert interchange_proc.poll() == 0, "Interchange exited with an error code, not 0"
+
+    task_channel.close()
+    context.term()