-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracking: implementation of RFC 0146 meta.categories #360727
Comments
I think it would be good to add the field before deciding which categories will initially be added, to avoid a major technical piece from being delayed by debate over which categories should be included. I think it would also be reasonable to add the categories one-by-one as the team starts categorizing things (thus, no categories will be added that aren't used, and there will be a reduced amount of complaining about some categories not being included initially). I am interested in opinions against either of those things. |
My personal opinion is that adding a field should reasonably happen after having at least one category defined, and adding at least one category defined should reasonably happen after writing down at least a general direction of how the base categories will be discussed and added. This directional design should have at least a majority support among people having actively confirmed the participation in the categorisation group. |
@NixOS/categorization: would a Matrix channel be helpful for coordination? |
Created at https://matrix.to/#/#nixpkgs-categorization:matrix.org. I invited all of the team members whose Matrix handles I could find (couldn't find @pyrotelekinetic's). |
Since Anderson Torres said they don't have time recently, we probably should start this work sooner rather than later.
RFC:
https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/blob/master/rfcs/0146-meta-categories.md
NixOS/rfcs#146
Prior attempts:
Main tasks
nix search
and search.nixos.org support categories?CC @AndersonTorres @7c6f434c @natsukium @fgaz @GetPsyched @Lyndeno @pyrotelekinetic
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: