You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can I ask you a question about reference scale for the Insitutype cell labeling part?
From https://github.com/Nanostring-Biostats/InSituType/blob/main/vignettes/NSCLC-supervised-cell-typing-vignette.Rmd
It mentioned:
4. A "reference matrix" giving the expected expression profile of each cell type, with genes in rows and cell types in columns.
The reference matrix must be in linear-scale, not log-scale.
And they used reference matrix in linear scale , provided as a part of the package:
Thank you for contacting us about our tools! To receive assistance, kindly email [email protected] with detailed information about your issue. If applicable, attach a screenshot of any encountered errors and include a copy of the modified script in Notepad. Our customer support team will help facilitate a review and resolution of the issue.
Thank you for choosing NanoString,
NanoString Dev Team
Can I ask you a question about reference scale for the Insitutype cell labeling part?
From https://github.com/Nanostring-Biostats/InSituType/blob/main/vignettes/NSCLC-supervised-cell-typing-vignette.Rmd
It mentioned:
4. A "reference matrix" giving the expected expression profile of each cell type, with genes in rows and cell types in columns.
The reference matrix must be in linear-scale, not log-scale.
And they used reference matrix in linear scale , provided as a part of the package:
data("ioprofiles")
From other side on nanostring tutorial:
refprofiles <- read.csv(https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nanostring-Biostats/CosMx-Cell-Profiles/main/Human/IO/IO.profiles.csv, row.names = 1, header = TRUE)
which is a log scale(?)
Could you please verify what scale of ref matrix should be used. Log vs linear scale give different results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: