Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open for discussion: Future of analysis scripts #11

Open
apreucil opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Open for discussion: Future of analysis scripts #11

apreucil opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@apreucil
Copy link
Collaborator

The way we are headed with common analysis figures is great. What about specific use cases or analyses?

  • For example, a component analysis of moist static energy over a specific region may be used for a specific research application, and not necessarily be produced with every model run.

My take: workflow can and should be used for reproducibility (especially creating packages and catalogs) but not everything needs to be included into one freanalysis_[realm] script. My concern is that specific figures will be created and users may not know what they were originally for or what they represent. However, if there are too many scripts it may be hard for discoverability of what’s usable? We need to find the sweet spot where it’s convenient for users to take advantage of what exists but not cumbersome to figure out what exists, or feel like they need to go through ten extra steps in order to create a plot for a newly added variable, for example.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant