Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add filesystem mount modules #92

Open
lastephey opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

add filesystem mount modules #92

lastephey opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@lastephey
Copy link
Collaborator

Add --home, --scratch, and --cfs mount modules to make mounting filesystems a little more straightforward for users.

@lastephey lastephey self-assigned this Oct 20, 2023
@chrissamuel
Copy link

I was wondering if it might be better to have something like:

--mount-group=home,scratch,cfs

That way could be easier to extend site by site without changing the options available to users?

@lastephey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sure, that seems like a good idea.

@kellyrowland
Copy link
Member

Opened #120 to add modules for various directories of interest.

@chrissamuel I don't think I quite understand the difference between what you've suggested and that any site using podman-hpc could add their own modules to mount file systems, directories, etc.

@danfulton
Copy link
Contributor

There's nothing we're currently doing to enforce that other sites would implement modules with the same names/flags as us (e.g. --gpu). I think it might, sort of, be more future proof, but also adds some complexity (no other site specific flags currently take options).

It might be worth sitting down and discussing CLI choices at some point... what we have is more organic than designed.

@scanon
Copy link
Member

scanon commented Dec 4, 2024

See pull #120

@scanon scanon added this to the Release 1.1.1 milestone Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants