Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the user may want to suspend the scanning and resume it #74

Open
Marzona opened this issue Dec 9, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

the user may want to suspend the scanning and resume it #74

Marzona opened this issue Dec 9, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@Marzona
Copy link
Owner

Marzona commented Dec 9, 2016

Scanning happens by tuning different frequencies, using a step to define the next frequency to be tuned.
Sometimes you spot a possible signal exactly in the middle of two tuned frequencies.. aka your scanning granularity is high enough.

One way to solve the issue is to reduce the size of the scanning step, another handy option would be to suspend the scanning, tune manually the signal and them resume the scanning from where it has been suspended.

When the scanning gets resumed it should re-read the scanning configuration (except the upper limit of the frequency range) so to update the scanning "while it is going"

@Marzona Marzona added this to the scanning improvements milestone Dec 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant