-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 686
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is ITK_USE_FLOAT_SPACE_PRECISION
obsolete? Build errors when = YES.
#4802
Comments
|
Thorough testing of float space precision is hard, and having a build option to make |
How many compile errors are there when |
I count 7, but it aborts building at 74%. |
I kicked off a build with |
If you decide to fix the errors, you might want to do it in the |
This broke again with recent changes. Here is an output for one project:
|
I now turned on |
I hear Bill Lorensen saying 'untested code is broken code' in my head :) |
a thought: Is this broken in the 5.4.1 tag? |
Probably not. This got broken in master. |
Can you give some context for why this is needed? I'm trying to think of a usecase where this has benefit. Is there someone who uses this feature? v6.0.0 could be a good time to remove the feature. PS: I'm building with this flag on with wrapping turned on. |
addressed in
|
I also turned on |
I've been building ITK with various build option permutations (to try and shake out the last -Wextra-semi warnings) and it seems to me that ITK does not build with
ITK_USE_FLOAT_SPACE_PRECISION = YES
.ex:
and
and others too.
Seems like no one is using this if it doesn't even build?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: