Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🤔 [ISSUE] - Block-Level Fallbacks Are Ignored When Global Fallback is Disabled #115

Open
Emnaghz opened this issue Sep 30, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #552
Open

🤔 [ISSUE] - Block-Level Fallbacks Are Ignored When Global Fallback is Disabled #115

Emnaghz opened this issue Sep 30, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #552

Comments

@Emnaghz
Copy link
Collaborator

Emnaghz commented Sep 30, 2024

Description

When the global fallback option is disabled in the settings, the chatbot does not respect the fallback configurations set at the block level. This leads to the chatbot failing to respond appropriately when no matching intent is found within a block.

Reproduction steps

1. Go to 'Setings > Chatbot'
2. Disable Global Fallbacks
3. Go back to Visual Editor, create an entry-point block and add a new fallback in 'Options' section
4. Start chatting with the chatbot and try to enter a message out of the context
5. No fallback message is displayed

Logs

No response

Browsers

No response

OS

No response

@omarNaifer12
Copy link

Hi @Emnaghz, I'd like to work on this issue.

@medchedli
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @omarNaifer12

Let's focus on #536 and get back to you about this one later. Thanks

@omarNaifer12
Copy link

Hi @medchedli, I’ve sent the PR, so I want to work on this issue now.

@omarNaifer12 omarNaifer12 linked a pull request Jan 11, 2025 that will close this issue
3 tasks
@omarNaifer12
Copy link

Hi @medchedli, sorry for working on this before it was assigned to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants