You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For certain characters, if they do not have the right value, they should be excluded from the analysis (or visually distinguished, e.g. by moving to a different column). Or maybe a more general way of forcing strict matching.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Further request for something along these lines from James Veitch - email 21st July 2018: I just started visualizing a worldwide key for Cyptotrama using the FSC Identikit framework. Certain characters definitively rule out some taxa, but not others. Is there a way to weight this accordingly?
I envision something like adding an asterisk on the taxa worksheet for the obligatory character state of a specific taxon. If someone chose a different character state than the one that had an asterisk, the taxon would immediately removed from consideration. I would not want to put extra weight if the character matches.
This arose out of a discussion with Matt Parratt, but it's come up a number of times before. People used to Lucid and other multi-access keys are used to stuff being ruled out entirely.
For certain characters, if they do not have the right value, they should be excluded from the analysis (or visually distinguished, e.g. by moving to a different column). Or maybe a more general way of forcing strict matching.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: