Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Red-line characters #38

Open
burkmarr opened this issue Sep 26, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Red-line characters #38

burkmarr opened this issue Sep 26, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@burkmarr
Copy link
Collaborator

For certain characters, if they do not have the right value, they should be excluded from the analysis (or visually distinguished, e.g. by moving to a different column). Or maybe a more general way of forcing strict matching.

@burkmarr burkmarr self-assigned this Sep 26, 2018
@burkmarr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Further request for something along these lines from James Veitch - email 21st July 2018: I just started visualizing a worldwide key for Cyptotrama using the FSC Identikit framework. Certain characters definitively rule out some taxa, but not others. Is there a way to weight this accordingly?
I envision something like adding an asterisk on the taxa worksheet for the obligatory character state of a specific taxon. If someone chose a different character state than the one that had an asterisk, the taxon would immediately removed from consideration. I would not want to put extra weight if the character matches.

@burkmarr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This arose out of a discussion with Matt Parratt, but it's come up a number of times before. People used to Lucid and other multi-access keys are used to stuff being ruled out entirely.

@burkmarr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Red-line characters

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant