allow missing build method if its name is empty "" #777
Conversation
This allows builder-like objects whose class is its own builder class, no need to convert later from the Builder type to the "real" type with a final build() This works well for the immutable classes Project Lombok will give you if you use @wither
|
Sounds reasonable enough to me. A unit test would be useful yes. And also javadoc note for One practical thing in the meantime: before the first merge, we need a Contributor License Agreement (CLA), from here: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/blob/master/contributor-agreement.pdf and all that is needed is to print, fill & sign, scan and email to Looking forward to complete patch, especially since it makes it easier to use Jackson with Lombok types. Interoperability is very important, and I use immutable classes a lot myself (although just "plain" Java ones so far). |
|
@galdosd Sorry to bug you, but is it possible to get the CLA? I am hoping to include this fix in 2.6.0. |
|
Equivalent fix checked in, hence closing this as resolved. |
This allows builder-like objects whose class is its own builder class,
no need to convert later from the Builder type to the "real" type
with a final build()
This works well for immutable classes with Project Lombok if you use lombok's @wither and was the best way I found to be able to integrate jackson and lombok
Missing unit test for now, so not quite ready for merge, but thought I'd start the PR anyway in case of any other feedback