You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With 2.5, Jackson will allow full support for JSOG.
Given that there is a nice implementation of ObjectIdGenerator and other necessary classes in https://github.com/jsog/jsog-jackson would it make sense to include this as part of core jackson-databind?
(and/or if possible/feasible, right in jackson-annotations, next to other implementations -- not 100% sure that is feasible tho).
One possibility would be to release 2.5 first, and then if it makes sense, bundle this in 2.6.
That might be the safest route, and also allow for quick fixes (if need be) for the JSOG handler implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(see #622 also)
With 2.5, Jackson will allow full support for JSOG.
Given that there is a nice implementation of
ObjectIdGenerator
and other necessary classes in https://github.com/jsog/jsog-jackson would it make sense to include this as part of corejackson-databind
?(and/or if possible/feasible, right in
jackson-annotations
, next to other implementations -- not 100% sure that is feasible tho).One possibility would be to release 2.5 first, and then if it makes sense, bundle this in 2.6.
That might be the safest route, and also allow for quick fixes (if need be) for the JSOG handler implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: