-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
[State of JS 2019] Question Outline #198
Comments
Would it make sense to add Nuxt and Next to the list of frameworks? |
We originally had Next in the Back-End section, but we decided to drop it. But yes if we still had it we'd probably add Nuxt, too. |
Interesting you decided to drop Great move to add |
Flutter in web technology? |
Maybe it'd be worth asking if one is using a meta framework (e.g. Nuxt.js for Vue, Next for React, Sapper for Svelte etc.)? I'd be eager to know how many devs use such a meta framework (or app framework) instead of relying on a component-level framework "only". |
Super happy to see NW.js added 🎉, but a little surprised to see NativeScript being removed. NativeScript-Vue has really taken off in the last year. It's become the go-to recommendation for the Vue community; and seems to be doing a lot more innovation around code sharing than anything else in that space. The example of having the templates for web and mobile kept in the same .vue file and reusing the shared logic between the two UI's just seems like a really intuitive approach to building and maintaining both: |
@akiroussama does Flutter have anything to do with JavaScript though? |
@SachaG a lot people of see Dart as a competitor to JS from the context of React Native vs Flutter - I think it's reasonably big FWIW but maybe not big enough for inclusion I wondered about the "Build Tools" section. It could probably be split into "bundlers" and "build tools" (as there's only one thing that's not really a bundler in there) Bundlers
Build Tools
for example Syntax: Could add optional chaining, import/export also |
would you consider lit-html the successor of Polymer? Although it's not a framework, people could be interested to track web components usage. And I think it's probably a mistake to drop the "backend" section. Tracking the JS ecosystem without nodejs or SSR solutions feels very wrong to me. It's one of the most interesting parts of State of JS. I would drop "other languages" section if you want to keep it shorter |
@S1ngS1ng those are all great suggestions! I can't change the survey now that it's live but I'll take them into account for next year. |
Oh and regarding translations, we didn't really have time to think about it this time but now that our infrastructure supports it since we're using our own platform, it's definitely something I want to do next time. |
Here's a preliminary list of the questions for this year's State of JS survey. Feedback welcome!
Major Changes
Demographics
Features/Patterns (have used it/know what it is/never heard of it)
Syntax
Language
Data Structures
Browser APIs
Other
Patterns (5-point opinion scale)
Technologies (would use again/would not use again/etc.)
JavaScript Flavors
ES6FlowFront-end Frameworks
PolymerData Layer
Back-end (get rid of this section?)
Testing
Mobile & Desktop
NativeScriptOther Tools (check those that you use)
Utilities
Build Tools
Other Languages
Text Editors
Resources
Blogs & Magazines
Sites & Courses
Podcasts
Opinions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: