We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
the http://jsonapi.org/ ( http://jsonapi.org/format/ ) describes the tag 'relationships'
relationships: a relationships object describing relationships between the resource and other JSON API resources. // ... { "type": "articles", "id": "1", "attributes": { "title": "Rails is Omakase" }, "relationships": { "author": { "links": { "self": "/articles/1/relationships/author", "related": "/articles/1/author" }, "data": { "type": "people", "id": "9" } } } } // ...
relationships: a relationships object describing relationships between the resource and other JSON API resources.
// ... { "type": "articles", "id": "1", "attributes": { "title": "Rails is Omakase" }, "relationships": { "author": { "links": { "self": "/articles/1/relationships/author", "related": "/articles/1/author" }, "data": { "type": "people", "id": "9" } } } } // ...
We are not using the tag 'relationships' .
The question is; should we use the 'relationships' -tag in the 'meta' - and 'data' - section ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think we should use this. All of the relations listed in the guideline could be included as far as I can see.
Sorry, something went wrong.
gnewton
mskyttner
ssbilkhu
jonesal
No branches or pull requests
the http://jsonapi.org/ ( http://jsonapi.org/format/ ) describes the tag 'relationships'
We are not using the tag 'relationships' .
The question is; should we use the 'relationships' -tag in the 'meta' - and 'data' - section ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: