You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’d suggest adding one more easing function from Jamoma, even if it’s not one of Penner’s easing functions: smoothPolynomial. This function has growth rate = 0 and curvature = 0 at the end points, and hence has a completely smooth way of starting and stopping. It might look pretty similar to e.g. the cubic ease in / out, but when using it to ride audio values in order for layers to come and go as drifting waves, there is a difference, and smoothPolynomial sounds really nice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Request from Trond:
I’d suggest adding one more easing function from Jamoma, even if it’s not one of Penner’s easing functions: smoothPolynomial. This function has growth rate = 0 and curvature = 0 at the end points, and hence has a completely smooth way of starting and stopping. It might look pretty similar to e.g. the cubic ease in / out, but when using it to ride audio values in order for layers to come and go as drifting waves, there is a difference, and smoothPolynomial sounds really nice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: