Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed Improper Method Call: Replaced NotImplementedError #652

Conversation

fazledyn-or
Copy link
Contributor

General information

This PR is for a normal bug fix.

Details

While triaging your project, our bug fixing tool generated the following message(s)-

In file: forward.py, class: StructuredDataName, there is a special method __eq__ that raises a NotImplementedError. If a special method supporting a binary operation is not implemented it should return NotImplemented. On the other hand, NotImplementedError should be raised from abstract methods inside user defined base classes to indicate that derived classes should override those methods. iCR suggested that the special method __eq__ should return NotImplemented instead of raising an exception. An example of how NotImplemented helps the interpreter support a binary operation is here.

In file: forward.py, class: StructuredDataID, there is a special method __eq__ that raises a NotImplementedError. If a special method supporting a binary operation is not implemented it should return NotImplemented. On the other hand, NotImplementedError should be raised from abstract methods inside user defined base classes to indicate that derived classes should override those methods. iCR suggested that the special method __eq__ should return NotImplemented instead of raising an exception. An example of how NotImplemented helps the interpreter support a binary operation is here.

Changes

Replaced occurance of NotImplementedError with NotImplemented

CLA Requirements

This section is only relevant if your project requires contributors to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) for external contributions.

All contributed commits are already automatically signed off.

The meaning of a signoff depends on the project, but it typically certifies that committer has the rights to submit this work under the same license and agrees to a Developer Certificate of Origin (see https://developercertificate.org/ for more information).
- Git Commit SignOff documentation

Sponsorship and Support

This work is done by the security researchers from OpenRefactory and is supported by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF): Project Alpha-Omega. Alpha-Omega is a project partnering with open source software project maintainers to systematically find new, as-yet-undiscovered vulnerabilities in open source code - and get them fixed – to improve global software supply chain security.

The bug is found by running the Intelligent Code Repair (iCR) tool by OpenRefactory and then manually triaging the results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2023

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@fazledyn-or
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA or my organization already has a signed CLA.

@fazledyn-or
Copy link
Contributor Author

recheck

@scolakovic scolakovic added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 5, 2024
@kbaikov kbaikov self-assigned this Mar 6, 2024
@kbaikov
Copy link
Contributor

kbaikov commented Mar 7, 2024

Thank you for your contribution! This PR needs some improvement before we can merge it:
Could you please rebase, since the file forward.py does not exist anymore and the relevant functionality was moved to syslog.py at the same location.

@fazledyn-or
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for your contribution! This PR needs some improvement before we can merge it: Could you please rebase, since the file forward.py does not exist anymore and the relevant functionality was moved to syslog.py at the same location.

Sure. I'll do it as soon as I can.

@CheckmkCI CheckmkCI force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 875a494 to 3419412 Compare May 29, 2024 08:27
@kbaikov
Copy link
Contributor

kbaikov commented Jun 10, 2024

Change has been successfully rebased and submitted as fc3688b with author metadata.
Thank you for your contribution.
This inspired several follow-up commits.

@kbaikov kbaikov closed this Jun 10, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request tracked
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants