Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using volume mounts vs bind mounts for the IoT Edge system modules #7408

Open
anttikes opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Using volume mounts vs bind mounts for the IoT Edge system modules #7408

anttikes opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@anttikes
Copy link

The documentation instructs using bind mounts for persistently storing the data of edgeAgent or edgeHub modules on the host filesystem.

Docker's own documentation recommends using volume mounts instead.

Is there any clear reason why bind mounts are preferred in the documentation? Would the same benefits (i.e. robustness) be achieved by using volume mounts?

In what kind of a situation would it be necessary to manually manipulate the files persisted by the system modules from the host side?

@vipeller vipeller self-assigned this Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants