Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Repo should be renamed to e.g. "reward_distances" #2

Open
anshradh opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Repo should be renamed to e.g. "reward_distances" #2

anshradh opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@anshradh
Copy link

Since the implementation for divergence-free reward distance calculations will also live in this repo (as well as possible other reward function distance implementations), the repo should be renamed to reflect that. setup.py etc. will also need to be modified.
@Rocamonde
Copy link
Contributor

@erik @AdamGleave what's your view on this?

@AdamGleave
Copy link

Yeah, EPIC is definitely too restrictive. We were having a discussion on Slack for what to call these class of distances with @ejnnr and @JoarSkalse. I think we're currently leaning towards STARTC (STAndardised Reward Comparison) which is also available on PyPi. Full options:

ELMs (Epic-Like Metrics)
IRC metrics (Informative Reward Comparison)
NORC (NOrmalised Reward Comparison)
STARC (STAndardised Reward Comparison)
EFARC (Epic-FAmily Reward Comparison)

@Rocamonde
Copy link
Contributor

I like starc!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@AdamGleave @Rocamonde @anshradh